My research poses questions about technology, writing, and public discourse that are increasingly relevant to rhetorical education in the 21st century.  

I have been awarded UMass Amherst’s Walker Gibson Prize for the best graduate essay on a topic in Rhetoric and Composition, the Rhetoric Society of America's Michael Leff Award, the Conference on College Composition and Communication's Chairs' Memorial Scholarship, and the Rhetoric Society of America's Gerard Hauser Award for the best paper presented by a graduate student at its biennial conference. In 2016, I produced a piece of digital scholarship that was published in Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy. In 2017, I published a chapter in the collection Methodologies for the Rhetoric of Health and Medicine (edited by Lisa Meloncon and J. Blake Scott, Routledge). I recently co-authored a piece with Matthew Barton that considers the shifting landscape of the digital public sphere and its implications for the writing classroom (forthcoming in Computers and Composition, 2019).

In my dissertation, Rhetorical Investments: Writing, Technology, and the Emerging Logics of the Public Sphere (2017), I argued that an “infrastructural” model of public discourse lays the groundwork for writing pedagogies that engage students in meaningful reflection about the dynamics of the digital landscape. Through two cases studies—one focusing on “old media” (the turn-of-the-century public lectures of sex educator Emma Elizabeth Walker) and one focusing on “new media” (the viral #blacklivesmatter rhetoric of spoken word poet Alexander Gray)—I developed the concept of rhetorical investment. I argued that this concept helps attune us to the ways that individual rhetors contribute to the transformation of the public sphere.

My current project investigates the ways that everyday writers use networked technologies to catalyze social change (The New Information Warriors: Rhetoric, Writing, and Social Change in the Digital Age). Specifically, this project focuses on new forms of persuasion that I term practices of networked mass persuasion. Influenced by tactics that have historically been the province of marketing and public relations professionals, political parties, and information operations specialists, practices of networked mass persuasion are characterized by two tendencies: 1) a tendency to privilege strategic messaging, amplification, and coordination over deliberation and direct contestation and 2) a tendency to compose texts that will circulate via the algorithmic, data-driven infrastructures of the social web. Though practices of “crowd swarming,” “viral marketing,” and “memetic warfare” may appear inconsistent with traditional democratic values, this project aims to demonstrate that practices such as these are increasingly central to social change writing in the 21st century.